According to online reports, Binance founder CZ posted on social media saying that he usually does not criticize other industry participants, but the incident report released by Safe used vague language to cover up the problem. After reading it, there were more questions than answers, and the questions that came to mind temporarily included: -What does "destroy Safe {Wallet} developer machine" mean? How did they crack this particular machine? Is it social engineering, viruses, etc.? - How do developer machines access "accounts operated by Bybit"? Some code is deployed directly from this developer machine to prod? - How did they trick Ledger's verification steps among multiple signers? Is it blind? Or did the signer not verify it correctly? - Is $1.4 billion the largest address managed using Safe? Why don't they target others? - What can other "self-managed, multi-signature" wallet providers and users learn from this?